Harry and Meghan's 'Secret Wedding Didn't Take Place', | 22 Words

According to a vicar who has close connections to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's "secret wedding" didn't actually take place...

Which totally contradicts Meghan's version of events during her interview with Oprah.

Getty

Read on to find out what actually happened...

Now, it's the interview everyone has been talking about.

Getty

Following their controversial departure from the royal family, Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, sat down with Oprah last week to give their side of the story.

Their 2-hour-long interview aired on CBS on Sunday, March 7th...

Getty

And viewers watched on in shock as some mind-blowing allegations were made against the monarchy.

For example...

It was claimed that senior members of the family had refused to get Meghan professional help when she was experiencing suicidal thoughts during her pregnancy with Archie.

Meghan also addressed that incident with her sister-in-law, the Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton.

Getty

Headlines were made in 2018 when Meghan allegedly "made Kate cry" in a row about bridesmaids' dresses in the days before her and Harry's wedding - well, in her chat with Oprah, Meghan claimed that Kate was the one to make her cry.

Though she did stress that Kate had apologized and that she had "forgiven her."

She also addressed the ongoing issues of racism within the monarchy.

Getty

Meghan claimed an unnamed senior member of the Royal family raised "concerns" about how dark Archie's skin would be before his birth.

"In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time, so we have in tandem the conversation of, 'you won't be given security, not gonna be given a title' and also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born."

But Meghan wasn't the only one to spill the royal tea.

Getty

Prince Harry himself spoke candidly about his current relationship with his family and how he has been "financially cut off," which initially left him fearing for the future.

Harry explained that he "had to get out," though when he did he was "cut off financially" when he and Meghan needed help the most...

Getty

He also added that they've since been relying on his inheritance from Princess Diana.

"I was totally cut off financially. My family cut me off – if I didn't have what my mom left me, we wouldn't have been able to do this."

"All I wanted to do was keep my family safe."

Getty

Meghan then insisted that they never had any plans at first to quit the U.K - she said the intention was to "do this forever" and that she told the royal family to "use me as much as you like."

Later in the interview, Oprah asked how the prince thinks the late Princess Diana would have felt about the rifts that drove them to step back from the royal family.

Getty

"I think she would feel very angry with how this has panned out, and very sad," Harry said, "But ultimately, all she'd ever want is for us to be happy."

Quite predictably, opinion has been well and truly divided over the interview...

With a vast majority feeling sympathetic for Harry and Meghan over what they've allegedly endured in the last few years.

But on the other hand...

People have been slamming the pair for agreeing to take part in Oprah's interview and have even been brandishing them as "liars"... including Piers Morgan, of course!

We all know that the British journalist has had a very personal vendetta against Meghan for years now ever since she supposedly snubbed him when she started dating Harry.

Getty

Well, his anger with Meghan reached a boiling point last week following the interview, resulting in him being forced to step down as co-host of Good Morning Britain after 41,000 complaints were made about him by the British public.

He branded Meghan as a liar...

And claimed she didn't feel suicidal as she claimed...

And now, another public figure has come forward with contradictions about Meghan's words in the interview.

Getty

We all remember the comment Meghan made about her and Harry getting privately married 3 days before the royal wedding, right?

Meghan claimed to Oprah that she and Harry had already said "I do" before meeting at the altar in front of global media.

Getty

"We called the Archbishop, and we just said, 'Look, this thing, this spectacle is for the world, but we want our union between us'.

She then added that the ceremony was "just the 2 of us in our back yard with the Archbishop of Canterbury."

Well, according to a Newcastle vicar, this isn't at all what happened.

Getty

Reverend Mark Edwards has claimed he was told that "no wedding took place" in Harry and Meghan's back yard in the days before their public ceremony.

Speaking to local media, he said he contacted the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby's office "to get some clarity" on their policy of performing private weddings.

He was apparently told that "Justin does not do private weddings. Meghan is an American, she does not understand."

Getty

He added that the person he spoke to told him "Justin had a private conversation with the couple in the garden about the wedding, but I can assure you, no wedding took place until the televised national event."

In the U.K, a marriage must be solemnized by a member of the clergy in a church, or in a place specified in a special license in the presence of 2 witnesses...

Getty

So it's easy to see why Meghan potentially made a small mistake about this one!

For more on Harry and Meghan's bombshell interview...

Scroll on...